ISSUE MONGERING?

Federal Communications Chairman Michael Copps is actively promoting a deception concerning the "Fairness Doctrine". Copps says that the prejudice "Doctrine" is not set for a comeback. Apparently he has not been listening to Pelosi & Reid, the chief tyrants against free speech and their despotic minions in the Democratic (Carpetbagger) and Republican (Scallywag) Parties.

Why am I speaking out against Copps? Because he indirectly called me an "issue monger" and "conspiracy theorist". I AM NEITHER.

The ISSUES are what is most pressing. To ignore ISSUES is to commit intellectual suicide, which has been done by most major network broadcast companies and their plastic faced, script reading puppets. If do not talk about the ISSUES, then the Modern Dictator Movement in the United States will continue its power grab and have us all regurgitating their profane and drone-ish doctrines. If power-mad politicians in Washington are talking about resurrecting the "Fairness Doctrine", then you can bet I'll be on that ISSUE.

And - Copps - for your information, it is not a conspiracy theory. When our political leaders are drafting legislation for its return it is no longer a theory and there is no conspiracy.

It appears the puppet Copps is a Utopian Drone. I thought much better of him before he revealed his allegiance. Now in America, contrary to the DHS assessment on Right-Wing Extremism, a person is innocent until proven guilty. So I'll give Copps some leniency, some time to come to his sense and retract his ignorance. Keep in mind, however, that if DHS, instead of me, were handling Copps guilt or innocence it would already be decided. DHS' policy is apparently guilty until proven innocent. If you have not yet read DHS' slanderous assessment, please do so. You will find that without committing any crime and without any evidence that crimes will be committed in the future, DHS assessed that and number of people are right-wing extremist. The list includes: Certain Christians, pro-lifers, those who are anti-illegal immigration, anti-new world order, and those who "bemoan the decline of the United States." WHAT DO THEY WANT US TO DO? CELEBRATE!!! Only a COMMUNIST RED TRAITOR ALDRICH AIMS BENEDICT ARNOLD JUDAS ISCARIOT TYPE would not WEEP & WAIL over the decline of the greatest nation in world history.

So many puppets. So many drones.

Is Copps a puppet?

He accused me of issue mongering. Only a puppet would of the "new" tolerance would try and silence a person from discussing the issues. So, imagine that, a puppet for the Dictator telling me and you not to talk about the issues at hand.

Also, DHS' assessment called the New World Order a "conspiracy theory" even thought every President since Bush I has talked about the NWO and driven us closer to it control, especially Obama. They are not the only ones. The Prime Minister of England and the President of Russia practically use the term every other week. YET, IS ONLY A CONSPIRACY THEORY.

And we should NOT be concerned with theories or ISSUES, apparently.

You decide! CHOOSE THESE PUPPETS OR YOUR FREEDOM!

PROTECT YOUR OWN FUTURE

The uselessness of the United Nations continues to shock the civilized world!

Colombo, Sri Lanka –

Gordon Weiss, U.N. spokesperson said Monday (May 11, 2009), “The U.N. has consistently warned against the bloodbath scenario as we’ve watched the steady increase in civilian deaths over the last months.”

Apparently, as the United Nations WATCHED, nearly a 1000 people were ethnically cleansed, including 106 children, in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Reminiscent of genocide in Rwanda, Africa, the U.N. has made quite a name for itself over the years by knowing of sure calamity, waiting until after disaster has struck, then acting as humanitarians to end the violence. NOTE: (1) the U.N. usually does not end the violence; please consider Mogadishu, or Darfur, Sudan, or the gangland battles with the Mexican government for that matter; (2) Anyone can be a humanitarian after the fact; what is so special about helping people after they have died?

That may sound harsh, especially to mindless supporters of globalization, but how cynical is it to MONITOR a death scenario without INTERVENING?

Are there no preventative measures to curb violence these days? Is everyone, including our savior, the United Nations, powerless to affect change in the world?

Whatever happened to preventative medicine? The ancient Far East used to practice true healing. A doctor cared for his patients. If they stayed healthy, they paid the doctor. If the patients became ill, the doctor paid them. Try explaining that one to your insurance company. Also, try getting a refund from you insurance company when you have overpaid. And, try recouping unused premium. The scam of insurance, caused by inflated prices, high-dollar lawyers, and especially trial lawyers, is bankrupting many individuals in many civilized countries. A similar scam is being ran by the U.N. Try explaining to the U.N. that education is more important than dropping bags of food into gang controlled areas of the world; that is it more efficient to teach a person how to fish than it is to give them fish; that it is more efficient to uphold laws and battle criminal gangsters than it is to peace-keep after a genocide. That is like trying to explain to an insurance company that when they take your premiums, and you never file a claim, that when they keep your money (premium) it is STEALING. The U.N. is stealing money from most countries in the world to act after the fact or NOT ACT AT ALL. Even insurance companies like All-State are becoming more proactive, offering small refunds and discounts to safe drivers. The U.N. needs to offer refunds and discounts to the United States for funding their substandard operations; or at least refund the countries that lost money in the U.N. “Oil for Food Scandal”, in which most of the THIEVES walked away. We need PREVENTATIVE ACTION, COMMON SENSE ACTION, EDUCATIONAL ACTION & POLICE ACTION not against innocent civilians (good-guys), but against dictators and gangsters world-wide. If the U.N. continues to prop-up dictators, protecting them as they did Sadaam Hussein, as they do protect the violent, Sudanese régimes by continuing to allow their presence on the U.N. Human Rights Commission, which is under the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). Imagine that, slave traders and violent aggressors protecting the world’s innocent for barbarous slave masters. What a great idea! But hey, the U.N. Commission on Human Rights is just a forum; they do not really plan on doing anything anyway.

Back to Sri Lanka… How many bodies must pile up here and across the globe before the United Nations revamps their policies and recreates their philosophy? How much longer will the citizens of the United States allow their globalist-representatives send tax dollars to an organization whose thought and strategy are more primitive than the counties they are trying to help?

A brave new world is upon us, and those leading the pack only treat symptoms. They apparently enjoy watching more than acting. They only want to get their hands dirty pilfering the global tax till, not actually preventing violence and crimes against humanity. It is time for A NEW WORLD ORDER, a rule of civilized people, not despotic gangsters and world dictators disguised as humanitarians. Whether by putting a gun to your head and a boot to your throat or creating laws to silence freedom of speech, DICTATORS IS DICTATORS, brothers and sisters. They all got to go.

TREAT THE ROOT OF THE PROBLEM -

FREE THE PEOPLE FROM PHYSICAL, MENTAL, EMOTIONAL, & SPIRITUAL DICTATORS EVERYWHERE!!!

Declaration of Independence

Note:

(1) If you have not read the Declaration, you should. If you have not read it in a while, maybe you should consider it again.

(2) All quotations are from the Declaration of Independence unless otherwise noted.

“Men must choose to be governed by God, or condemn themselves to be ruled by tyrants.” William Penn

A copy of the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, and a yellowed scrap of paper with a promise I made many moons before, travel with me wherever I go, secured in my back pocket. I carry those documents as a Christian carries the bible; or how they should carry the bible, not to pound people’s heads to force an impression or compliance, but to understand the beauty and significance of freedom.

Just as theological qualifications are not needed to understand the Sermon on the Mount, degrees in law and political science are not needed to understand the Declaration of Independence. Anyone able to read, with grammar school reasoning skills, can comprehend either text and glean insight into the arterial doctrine of each. They are direct, simple, and clear. They both reveal the mind of liberty; both say, “The people who think and act this way are free; this mindset needs no man-devised overlord to govern, for they rule themselves rightly, establishing peace, effecting harmony, and expressing love in such ways as to inspire more of the same.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident….”

Who needs instruction when the lessons are obvious? There is no mystery here; hierarchy in the status of human freedom does not exist. Though genetic differences be present, that of education and experience also, the Creator allocates no distinction in humans regarding “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.” Each human has the privilege to be alive and venture this existence. Each one among us has the privilege of independence, emancipation; that is, to live unfettered from the affliction of our fellowman, whether it be physical, psychological, or spiritual bondage. Each individual has the benefit to pursue personal contentment; that quest may not end fulfilled, but the birthright to chase that goal cannot be denied. These powerful three are unalienable; they cannot be challenged; they are indisputable; they are absolute guarantees of freedom. They cannot even be taught with perfect accuracy, for words are unable to express their richness, breadth, and depth; these truths are realized in the furnace of experience. Native to all, no one person, no group of people, no governing body could ever separate a human being from these three; it is impossible – oh, for the eyes with which to see, and the heart to understand that truth.

“That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

Stated already is that no governing body has the power to actually take control of the individual; this is a matter difficult to know for the power-mad and the defenseless. Declared unmistakably is that governments are not free to do as they choose, not free to follow impulses that differ from those they govern. Truth is, individuals are free and governments are subservient. Listen, governments must acquiesce to the will of the people; they have no right, executive, legislative, or judicial to subvert a majority vote of the populace. Government is for securing the great three unalienable rights and rights like these. Take note: “[Men] are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness” (additional emphasis JSM). “Among these”; the entirety of undeniable rights is not listed. It is the obligation of government to safeguard these for her people, so they remain vigorous and cheering, intent to return a supply of greater power to her for the securing of an even greater confidence.

“That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundations on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

The government has no other real power than that which is authorized by the people; and only unconscious slaves would think and behave as if they did not know this truth. When government destroys Life, curtails Liberty, or hinders the pursuit of Happiness, its dissolution is essential to freedom. And did you notice the naming of another unalienable right of the people? “[I]t is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government….” A right unchallengeable by meager government, upheld in wisdom by the phrases, “When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary…” and “not to be changed for light and transient causes…” and “a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, their duty, to throw such government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” Indeed, it is no insubstantial matter to engage in seditious philosophy, nor should it be undertaken by those without resolve to finish, no matter the conditions. Nonetheless, with the right cause- that being government which pursues a single “Object” that would render void the unalienable rights of her people, subjecting them to superfluous rule, evidenced by consistent abuse and an undermining of the majority’s consent -a detrimental government is clay fashioned by the people, rewritten and restyled, and sheltered by “new Guards” of freedom.

“[W]ith a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence….”

Never far from the minds of the founding fathers was the true origin of freedom. The temporal alone can become malignant, when not invigorated by the spiritual. Of course, there is profound reason for this. With its death always in view, the heart of the temporal stirs towards artificial glory and begins to form a synthetic immortality. This is first peculiar since the temporal has no concern or warmth towards the spiritual; to seize a spiritual idea, it would seem the temporal had betrayed its own. This grasping for the everlasting is peculiar in a second sense, in that the temporal can never achieve perpetual existence; it does not have the inherent qualities to sustain itself forever, nor could it alone obtain them. Why the temporal seeks for immortality is beyond reason. To be remembered by others, recorded in school books, is at best the hope of fools, for what is not forgotten in years, decades dispose of; what escapes decades is consumed by centuries; what rarity eludes the centuries is devoured by the millennial; what slips beyond the millennial is engulfed by ages; what probably miraculously escapes ages is reduced by eonaeon; what unfeasibly escapes eonaeon is absorbed at the incalculable gap between the end of time and the beginning of eternity, a place where surely no person will hear utterance of any name. For the temporal, to seek remembrance is absurd, perhaps it has stolen the idea as Prometheus the fire did take or caught glimpse of an apparent connection as Emerson relates in his “History” lesson:

“There is a relation between the hours of our life and the centuries of time. As the air I breathe is drawn from the great repositories of nature, as the light on my book is yielded by a star a hundred millions of miles distant, as the poise of my body depends on the equilibrium of centrifugal and centripetal forces, so the hours should be instructed by the ages and the ages explained by the hours. Of universal mind each individual man is one more incarnation. All its properties consist in him.”

Whether myth or truth unverifiable, the temporal longs for something it cannot in fact obtain, something that it will never fully grasp. Therefore, it fashions images of itself and grandiose images of power, and hunts for what it knows is vanity. The emptiness of the temporal depresses and weakens the soul. With nothing, and nothing to hope for, except what is seen and decaying, the temporal seeks to preserve its own, to empower itself at all cost, each person above their fellows. In doing so it casts superiority upon the individual self in imitation of freedom, yet without regard for other individuals, consequently nullifying the true essence of freedom for all and advocating the creation and reign of oppressors.

Therefore, protection of true freedom must come from beyond humanity. A firm reliance beyond the temporal is necessary in achieving the concept of unalienable liberty. It must originate outside of man, from a source eternal, rising from that boundless place, where neither moth nor rust destroys, where no thief breaks in and steals. True freedom thrives and directs an extraordinary course of events that do give birth in the temporal realm, arriving in the thoughts and hearts of humans as possibilities of hope, as integrity and incorruptibility, as justice and security, as purpose and freedom, recognized from the earth by those gazing into the infinite fields of space as evident, benevolent providence.

“No man can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon.” – Jesus

WHO WILL HELP, WHEN "THEY" COME FOR YOU?

Thus it is written, set in stone, and cannot be retracted:

"They" are coming to take you away. He he, ho ho.

In Phoenix, Arizona... and soon, everywhere…

Reminiscent of every fascist state on historic record and in literary invention, Phoenix authorities raided the private residence of a blogger. Not a drug lord. Not a mass murderer. Not a bank robber. A blogger. Why? For criticism of "their" department's actions? Simple revenge? Perhaps, but whatever the true motive, it was all "by the book", because a judge had issued a warrant.

The blogger, Jeff Pataky, a software engineer, started a blog called "Bad Phoenix Cops" based upon police involvement during his divorce. Pataky believed he was treated unfairly in the matter and reported it on his blog. Rightly so, apparently, when certain charges were dropped because of a lack of evidence.

Pataky planned to shut down the blog after those certain charges were dropped, but began receiving support and tips from many retired and active officers concerning other odd happenings. Pataky moved on some of these tips and is now feeling the wrath of the Phoenix Police Department. "They" obtained a warrant to raid Pataky's home and confiscate computers, routers, hard drives, etc., effectively stopping the vile blogger in his tracks.

Now, I do not know Pataky. I do not know if he is an honest man. However, the facts of the case are evident. Moreover, I know that Pataky is a citizen of the United States of America and no citizen should be the victim of law enforcement intimidation or terror. Sure, this is how law enforcement operates in despotic governments, but not in a free republic; and I suppose that is the issue at hand. Or is it?

Are we convinced the primary issue is the reality of authoritarian ruthlessness and abuses of power that threaten freedom? That is a very serious matter. Abuse of power is criminal. Perhaps, though, our first focus should target our own response to corruptions of law and abuses of power, rather than the abusers themselves. You see, despots are ever among us, even in the United States, acting with the intolerance and brutality that swells the pride of third-world dictators. So should we say, "Oh, this is a kinder, gentler tyrant" or "These fascists aren't as awful as those other fascists"? Or, maybe say, "Well they may be attacking our freedom of speech, but at least we don't live in a third-world nightmare. At least we still have some freedoms." May we never be so languid in our responses to abuse! Most definitely, we should confront those who abuse power, but let us first confront ourselves, for we the people have given "them" the confidence to perpetrate such contempt against us. The primary issue revolves around our carelessness, our sitting back and watching, while the yoke is lowered onto our necks, in a voluntary relinquishment of freedom.

Never forget the bewildering case of Catherine Genovese. "Kitty," as she was called, was murdered in New York City before a myriad of witnesses, all of whom opted to allow her to suffer and die, rather than take action on her behalf. The year was 1964, but it appears full-blown cases of cynicism, apathy, and desensitization prevailed then, as they do now. I am not saying Pataky is Genovese. I am not saying Pataky did not challenge the Phoenix police with his blog, or that he is innocent of annoying and pestering. I am saying that he has the right in a free society to publish the content of his choosing without fascist retaliation. I also believe that it is our obligation as free citizens of the United States of America to come to his aid in criticizing the overly aggressive tactics of law enforcement and their unreasonable censure. And not in his case only.

It is no longer safe, reasonable, nor intelligent to believe that the actions of law enforcement are always within the boundaries of justice or in the best interest of the citizenry. There are noble police officers, judges, and maybe even politicans, who will stand with us on this matter against abuses of power; without doubt, there are officers and others who would sacrifice their very lives for liberty and justice, and many do each day. However, it is our personal responsibility to remain vigilant and face the dangerous possibilities of our "changing" world and let no abuse of power go unrequited.

Tell your family, friends, and neighbors. Shout it from the rooftops. Email and blog the planet full, until every living person awakens to the reality that if this could happen to one of us, it could happen to us all. The police had a warrant. This was not some misguided, uneducated thug acting on a drug-induced whim with no regard for personal and property rights. This was the law. The law was used to violate this man and his lawful rights.

You may say this is a small thing and I am exaggerating. I beg you to look at the bigger picture and to consider again the implications.

Do you value the freedom of speech?

Do you value your rights as a free citizen?

Will you overlook or totally ignore evident abuse?

Finally, bear in mind, who will help when "they" come for you?